<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death of an Inbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/</link>
	<description>Driving Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arlene Murchinson</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-18259</link>
		<dc:creator>Arlene Murchinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-18259</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.italynikescarpe.com/nike-blazer-mid/nike-blazer-mid-premium-09-scarpe-da-basket-nd-retro-p-428&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nike Blazer Mid Premium &#039;09 scarpe da basket ND Retro&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.italynikescarpe.com/nike-blazer-mid/nike-blazer-mid-premium-09-scarpe-da-basket-nd-retro-p-428" rel="nofollow"><strong>Nike Blazer Mid Premium &#8217;09 scarpe da basket ND Retro</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle BI Publisher Blog</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle BI Publisher Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] I did start a blog entry yesterday, it was going to be a Dexter diatribe,&#160;talking about the death or not of email - definitely not in my case, development processes and how good our team of [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] I did start a blog entry yesterday, it was going to be a Dexter diatribe,&nbsp;talking about the death or not of email &#8211; definitely not in my case, development processes and how good our team of [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Ha, meatworld. I&#039;m going to have to borrow that one. I don&#039;t plan to declare any type of bankruptcy, although I may blog about how others have done that. It&#039;s tought to keep up with the firehose, but it&#039;s fun.
Thanks for reading,
Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, meatworld. I&#8217;m going to have to borrow that one. I don&#8217;t plan to declare any type of bankruptcy, although I may blog about how others have done that. It&#8217;s tought to keep up with the firehose, but it&#8217;s fun.<br />
Thanks for reading,<br />
Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-15146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-15146</guid>
		<description>Ha, meatworld. I&#039;m going to have to borrow that one. I don&#039;t plan to declare any type of bankruptcy, although I may blog about how others have done that. It&#039;s tought to keep up with the firehose, but it&#039;s fun.
Thanks for reading,
Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, meatworld. I&#8217;m going to have to borrow that one. I don&#8217;t plan to declare any type of bankruptcy, although I may blog about how others have done that. It&#8217;s tought to keep up with the firehose, but it&#8217;s fun.<br />
Thanks for reading,<br />
Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel garry</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>joel garry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 23:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-231</guid>
		<description>This morning I went to intuit to order the cheap quickbooks, which oddly enough the local mortar Fry&#039;s hasn&#039;t had in stock in weeks.  I tried putting in some expired discount code, which seemed to stimulate it to ask if I wanted to chat with a salesperson.  Seemed like a reasonable thing to do, so I clicked on the yes tab, which crashed IE 7 XP java code, losing my half-done order.  So I called and waited and waited, eventually getting some guy in AZ who was nice enough to waive the shipping charges.

Business needs a solid infrastructure, folks.  Used to be I could make a phone call and be reasonably assured it would work.  This creaky interweb thing with no non-repudiation or predictable response/availability is gonna come crashing down.  

As far as all the new stuff, eventually everyone is going to realize the key to personal stress reduction/productivity maximization is being able to control the rate and volume of information.  At one extreme, there&#039;s the Cuckoo&#039;s Egg guy, who simply turned off all access.  At the other extreme there&#039;s  twittervision.  In between we have email bankruptcy, various techs-of-the-moment that come and go, and hucksters.  Trust is the essence of all business, the sociobiologists even think it is hardwired into us.  So what are you going to trust, email?  Meatworld face-to-face salespeople?  Your own personal Jesus in the video booth?  People you got high with when you were a teenager?  [A-Z,0-9*]logs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning I went to intuit to order the cheap quickbooks, which oddly enough the local mortar Fry&#8217;s hasn&#8217;t had in stock in weeks.  I tried putting in some expired discount code, which seemed to stimulate it to ask if I wanted to chat with a salesperson.  Seemed like a reasonable thing to do, so I clicked on the yes tab, which crashed IE 7 XP java code, losing my half-done order.  So I called and waited and waited, eventually getting some guy in AZ who was nice enough to waive the shipping charges.</p>
<p>Business needs a solid infrastructure, folks.  Used to be I could make a phone call and be reasonably assured it would work.  This creaky interweb thing with no non-repudiation or predictable response/availability is gonna come crashing down.  </p>
<p>As far as all the new stuff, eventually everyone is going to realize the key to personal stress reduction/productivity maximization is being able to control the rate and volume of information.  At one extreme, there&#8217;s the Cuckoo&#8217;s Egg guy, who simply turned off all access.  At the other extreme there&#8217;s  twittervision.  In between we have email bankruptcy, various techs-of-the-moment that come and go, and hucksters.  Trust is the essence of all business, the sociobiologists even think it is hardwired into us.  So what are you going to trust, email?  Meatworld face-to-face salespeople?  Your own personal Jesus in the video booth?  People you got high with when you were a teenager?  [A-Z,0-9*]logs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel garry</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-15133</link>
		<dc:creator>joel garry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-15133</guid>
		<description>This morning I went to intuit to order the cheap quickbooks, which oddly enough the local mortar Fry&#039;s hasn&#039;t had in stock in weeks.  I tried putting in some expired discount code, which seemed to stimulate it to ask if I wanted to chat with a salesperson.  Seemed like a reasonable thing to do, so I clicked on the yes tab, which crashed IE 7 XP java code, losing my half-done order.  So I called and waited and waited, eventually getting some guy in AZ who was nice enough to waive the shipping charges.

Business needs a solid infrastructure, folks.  Used to be I could make a phone call and be reasonably assured it would work.  This creaky interweb thing with no non-repudiation or predictable response/availability is gonna come crashing down.  

As far as all the new stuff, eventually everyone is going to realize the key to personal stress reduction/productivity maximization is being able to control the rate and volume of information.  At one extreme, there&#039;s the Cuckoo&#039;s Egg guy, who simply turned off all access.  At the other extreme there&#039;s  twittervision.  In between we have email bankruptcy, various techs-of-the-moment that come and go, and hucksters.  Trust is the essence of all business, the sociobiologists even think it is hardwired into us.  So what are you going to trust, email?  Meatworld face-to-face salespeople?  Your own personal Jesus in the video booth?  People you got high with when you were a teenager?  [A-Z,0-9*]logs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning I went to intuit to order the cheap quickbooks, which oddly enough the local mortar Fry&#8217;s hasn&#8217;t had in stock in weeks.  I tried putting in some expired discount code, which seemed to stimulate it to ask if I wanted to chat with a salesperson.  Seemed like a reasonable thing to do, so I clicked on the yes tab, which crashed IE 7 XP java code, losing my half-done order.  So I called and waited and waited, eventually getting some guy in AZ who was nice enough to waive the shipping charges.</p>
<p>Business needs a solid infrastructure, folks.  Used to be I could make a phone call and be reasonably assured it would work.  This creaky interweb thing with no non-repudiation or predictable response/availability is gonna come crashing down.  </p>
<p>As far as all the new stuff, eventually everyone is going to realize the key to personal stress reduction/productivity maximization is being able to control the rate and volume of information.  At one extreme, there&#8217;s the Cuckoo&#8217;s Egg guy, who simply turned off all access.  At the other extreme there&#8217;s  twittervision.  In between we have email bankruptcy, various techs-of-the-moment that come and go, and hucksters.  Trust is the essence of all business, the sociobiologists even think it is hardwired into us.  So what are you going to trust, email?  Meatworld face-to-face salespeople?  Your own personal Jesus in the video booth?  People you got high with when you were a teenager?  [A-Z,0-9*]logs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siva Jayaraman</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Siva Jayaraman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 06:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Hi Jake, I completely agree there is going to be a lot more of  writing going to happen on the walls of facebook (ref your comment on &quot;Check out Oracle Events&quot;) but if that is going to be the writing on the wall for email, we will have to wait and watch:) You are far more deep into the world of web 2.0 and your prediction has more credibility than mine for sure.
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jake, I completely agree there is going to be a lot more of  writing going to happen on the walls of facebook (ref your comment on &#8220;Check out Oracle Events&#8221;) but if that is going to be the writing on the wall for email, we will have to wait and watch:) You are far more deep into the world of web 2.0 and your prediction has more credibility than mine for sure.<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siva Jayaraman</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-15145</link>
		<dc:creator>Siva Jayaraman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 06:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-15145</guid>
		<description>Hi Jake, I completely agree there is going to be a lot more of  writing going to happen on the walls of facebook (ref your comment on &quot;Check out Oracle Events&quot;) but if that is going to be the writing on the wall for email, we will have to wait and watch:) You are far more deep into the world of web 2.0 and your prediction has more credibility than mine for sure.
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jake, I completely agree there is going to be a lot more of  writing going to happen on the walls of facebook (ref your comment on &#8220;Check out Oracle Events&#8221;) but if that is going to be the writing on the wall for email, we will have to wait and watch:) You are far more deep into the world of web 2.0 and your prediction has more credibility than mine for sure.<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Siva,
You guys are so rational and level-headed. Did you know that companies like Ingersoll Rand have good-sized Facebook networks? You should browse the company networks pages. I think you&#039;ll be shocked.

I found a case study here at Oracle, a guy 2 years out of college with a robust network of college friends. He doesn&#039;t care about work creeping over into Facebook. He&#039;s not as active as before, but he uses it to stay in touch with college friends. I need to ask him about his thoughts on email.

Anyway, work is already all over Facebook. It&#039;s become a way to maintain professional relationships too. It&#039;s a communication medium for millions of people. Facebook has designs on being an interweb within the interwebs, and they&#039;re leading the charge right now. LinkedIn and MySpace are following the platform approach.

Dunno looks like q.e.d. to me. But I&#039;m not above making a wild prediction just to get your attention :)
Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siva,<br />
You guys are so rational and level-headed. Did you know that companies like Ingersoll Rand have good-sized Facebook networks? You should browse the company networks pages. I think you&#8217;ll be shocked.</p>
<p>I found a case study here at Oracle, a guy 2 years out of college with a robust network of college friends. He doesn&#8217;t care about work creeping over into Facebook. He&#8217;s not as active as before, but he uses it to stay in touch with college friends. I need to ask him about his thoughts on email.</p>
<p>Anyway, work is already all over Facebook. It&#8217;s become a way to maintain professional relationships too. It&#8217;s a communication medium for millions of people. Facebook has designs on being an interweb within the interwebs, and they&#8217;re leading the charge right now. LinkedIn and MySpace are following the platform approach.</p>
<p>Dunno looks like q.e.d. to me. But I&#8217;m not above making a wild prediction just to get your attention <img src='http://theappslab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-15144</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-15144</guid>
		<description>Siva,
You guys are so rational and level-headed. Did you know that companies like Ingersoll Rand have good-sized Facebook networks? You should browse the company networks pages. I think you&#039;ll be shocked.

I found a case study here at Oracle, a guy 2 years out of college with a robust network of college friends. He doesn&#039;t care about work creeping over into Facebook. He&#039;s not as active as before, but he uses it to stay in touch with college friends. I need to ask him about his thoughts on email.

Anyway, work is already all over Facebook. It&#039;s become a way to maintain professional relationships too. It&#039;s a communication medium for millions of people. Facebook has designs on being an interweb within the interwebs, and they&#039;re leading the charge right now. LinkedIn and MySpace are following the platform approach.

Dunno looks like q.e.d. to me. But I&#039;m not above making a wild prediction just to get your attention :)
Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siva,<br />
You guys are so rational and level-headed. Did you know that companies like Ingersoll Rand have good-sized Facebook networks? You should browse the company networks pages. I think you&#8217;ll be shocked.</p>
<p>I found a case study here at Oracle, a guy 2 years out of college with a robust network of college friends. He doesn&#8217;t care about work creeping over into Facebook. He&#8217;s not as active as before, but he uses it to stay in touch with college friends. I need to ask him about his thoughts on email.</p>
<p>Anyway, work is already all over Facebook. It&#8217;s become a way to maintain professional relationships too. It&#8217;s a communication medium for millions of people. Facebook has designs on being an interweb within the interwebs, and they&#8217;re leading the charge right now. LinkedIn and MySpace are following the platform approach.</p>
<p>Dunno looks like q.e.d. to me. But I&#8217;m not above making a wild prediction just to get your attention <img src='http://theappslab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siva Jayaraman</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Siva Jayaraman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>I am really not sure to say a yes or a not to death of email but for sure there is going to be a consolidation of the medium of communication... today there are many of them with a AIM (replaced by Pidgin), Oracle Messenger, Pownce,Facebook,google talk, email from a communication perspective,though IM hasnt completely replaced email. Whats happening is one medium is taking a preference over the other and agree with Paul there....I think there is going to be a convergence and what stays and what doesn&#039;t... your guess is as good as mine...:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really not sure to say a yes or a not to death of email but for sure there is going to be a consolidation of the medium of communication&#8230; today there are many of them with a AIM (replaced by Pidgin), Oracle Messenger, Pownce,Facebook,google talk, email from a communication perspective,though IM hasnt completely replaced email. Whats happening is one medium is taking a preference over the other and agree with Paul there&#8230;.I think there is going to be a convergence and what stays and what doesn&#8217;t&#8230; your guess is as good as mine&#8230;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siva Jayaraman</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-15143</link>
		<dc:creator>Siva Jayaraman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-15143</guid>
		<description>I am really not sure to say a yes or a not to death of email but for sure there is going to be a consolidation of the medium of communication... today there are many of them with a AIM (replaced by Pidgin), Oracle Messenger, Pownce,Facebook,google talk, email from a communication perspective,though IM hasnt completely replaced email. Whats happening is one medium is taking a preference over the other and agree with Paul there....I think there is going to be a convergence and what stays and what doesn&#039;t... your guess is as good as mine...:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really not sure to say a yes or a not to death of email but for sure there is going to be a consolidation of the medium of communication&#8230; today there are many of them with a AIM (replaced by Pidgin), Oracle Messenger, Pownce,Facebook,google talk, email from a communication perspective,though IM hasnt completely replaced email. Whats happening is one medium is taking a preference over the other and agree with Paul there&#8230;.I think there is going to be a convergence and what stays and what doesn&#8217;t&#8230; your guess is as good as mine&#8230;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 05:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>I love a good debate. I truly believe the business world will be turned on its ear in the next 3-5 years as newly minted college graduates flood the workspace.

I know all of you remember the beginning of the Bubble, about 10 years ago. I was right out of college, full of great ideas, wanting to share interweb goodness. Then I hit the corporate wall. 

Oracle&#039;s 10.6 SC was the rage then, but guess what? In the next year or so, 10.7 NCA replaced it as we embraced the interweb. So, maybe I have a bleeding edge job, but still, I think social networks will take over business communication.

They are really easy, and you can pre-populate them with all your employees. Plus, there are other benefits. 

Dunno, I hope we can do a check in 3 years from now. So I can say &quot;told you so&quot;.

Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love a good debate. I truly believe the business world will be turned on its ear in the next 3-5 years as newly minted college graduates flood the workspace.</p>
<p>I know all of you remember the beginning of the Bubble, about 10 years ago. I was right out of college, full of great ideas, wanting to share interweb goodness. Then I hit the corporate wall. </p>
<p>Oracle&#8217;s 10.6 SC was the rage then, but guess what? In the next year or so, 10.7 NCA replaced it as we embraced the interweb. So, maybe I have a bleeding edge job, but still, I think social networks will take over business communication.</p>
<p>They are really easy, and you can pre-populate them with all your employees. Plus, there are other benefits. </p>
<p>Dunno, I hope we can do a check in 3 years from now. So I can say &#8220;told you so&#8221;.</p>
<p>Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-15142</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 05:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-15142</guid>
		<description>I love a good debate. I truly believe the business world will be turned on its ear in the next 3-5 years as newly minted college graduates flood the workspace.

I know all of you remember the beginning of the Bubble, about 10 years ago. I was right out of college, full of great ideas, wanting to share interweb goodness. Then I hit the corporate wall. 

Oracle&#039;s 10.6 SC was the rage then, but guess what? In the next year or so, 10.7 NCA replaced it as we embraced the interweb. So, maybe I have a bleeding edge job, but still, I think social networks will take over business communication.

They are really easy, and you can pre-populate them with all your employees. Plus, there are other benefits. 

Dunno, I hope we can do a check in 3 years from now. So I can say &quot;told you so&quot;.

Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love a good debate. I truly believe the business world will be turned on its ear in the next 3-5 years as newly minted college graduates flood the workspace.</p>
<p>I know all of you remember the beginning of the Bubble, about 10 years ago. I was right out of college, full of great ideas, wanting to share interweb goodness. Then I hit the corporate wall. </p>
<p>Oracle&#8217;s 10.6 SC was the rage then, but guess what? In the next year or so, 10.7 NCA replaced it as we embraced the interweb. So, maybe I have a bleeding edge job, but still, I think social networks will take over business communication.</p>
<p>They are really easy, and you can pre-populate them with all your employees. Plus, there are other benefits. </p>
<p>Dunno, I hope we can do a check in 3 years from now. So I can say &#8220;told you so&#8221;.</p>
<p>Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 23:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Its interesting how people get used to modalities, and can&#039;t imagine anything better ... until some guy comes along with something new and says &quot;look at my gooflogimr ... it&#039;s not email, IM or a blog, wiki or facebook ... its better ...&quot;

Email as a mode of communication is a relatively young thing, but it has been incredibly successful because is is/was so much better than the alternatives and so simple. But the email mode was invented at a time before all of the content uploading/publishing came to be. Bringing us to a stage now where we are starting to feel cramped by the artificial walls between these different facilities, and forced to do really stupid things by convention (like mail MB files to 20 collegues, who then change and mail back to the group). 

Which makes me feel that this we&#039;re not seeing a &quot;battle of modes&quot;, because that assumes the modes are somehow fixed. I think what we&#039;ll be surprised by in the years to come is how some smart cookies bend and morph the modes into something new and better.

In other words, I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll still be using gmail in 5 years time .... but it won&#039;t be a &quot;mail client&quot; in the sense we understand it today. 

Perhaps another interesting question is whether I&#039;ll still have a _corporate_ &quot;mail&quot; facility in 5-10 years time..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting how people get used to modalities, and can&#8217;t imagine anything better &#8230; until some guy comes along with something new and says &#8220;look at my gooflogimr &#8230; it&#8217;s not email, IM or a blog, wiki or facebook &#8230; its better &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Email as a mode of communication is a relatively young thing, but it has been incredibly successful because is is/was so much better than the alternatives and so simple. But the email mode was invented at a time before all of the content uploading/publishing came to be. Bringing us to a stage now where we are starting to feel cramped by the artificial walls between these different facilities, and forced to do really stupid things by convention (like mail MB files to 20 collegues, who then change and mail back to the group). </p>
<p>Which makes me feel that this we&#8217;re not seeing a &#8220;battle of modes&#8221;, because that assumes the modes are somehow fixed. I think what we&#8217;ll be surprised by in the years to come is how some smart cookies bend and morph the modes into something new and better.</p>
<p>In other words, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll still be using gmail in 5 years time &#8230;. but it won&#8217;t be a &#8220;mail client&#8221; in the sense we understand it today. </p>
<p>Perhaps another interesting question is whether I&#8217;ll still have a _corporate_ &#8220;mail&#8221; facility in 5-10 years time..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-15134</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-15134</guid>
		<description>Its interesting how people get used to modalities, and can&#039;t imagine anything better ... until some guy comes along with something new and says &quot;look at my gooflogimr ... it&#039;s not email, IM or a blog, wiki or facebook ... its better ...&quot;

Email as a mode of communication is a relatively young thing, but it has been incredibly successful because is is/was so much better than the alternatives and so simple. But the email mode was invented at a time before all of the content uploading/publishing came to be. Bringing us to a stage now where we are starting to feel cramped by the artificial walls between these different facilities, and forced to do really stupid things by convention (like mail MB files to 20 collegues, who then change and mail back to the group). 

Which makes me feel that this we&#039;re not seeing a &quot;battle of modes&quot;, because that assumes the modes are somehow fixed. I think what we&#039;ll be surprised by in the years to come is how some smart cookies bend and morph the modes into something new and better.

In other words, I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll still be using gmail in 5 years time .... but it won&#039;t be a &quot;mail client&quot; in the sense we understand it today. 

Perhaps another interesting question is whether I&#039;ll still have a _corporate_ &quot;mail&quot; facility in 5-10 years time..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting how people get used to modalities, and can&#8217;t imagine anything better &#8230; until some guy comes along with something new and says &#8220;look at my gooflogimr &#8230; it&#8217;s not email, IM or a blog, wiki or facebook &#8230; its better &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Email as a mode of communication is a relatively young thing, but it has been incredibly successful because is is/was so much better than the alternatives and so simple. But the email mode was invented at a time before all of the content uploading/publishing came to be. Bringing us to a stage now where we are starting to feel cramped by the artificial walls between these different facilities, and forced to do really stupid things by convention (like mail MB files to 20 collegues, who then change and mail back to the group). </p>
<p>Which makes me feel that this we&#8217;re not seeing a &#8220;battle of modes&#8221;, because that assumes the modes are somehow fixed. I think what we&#8217;ll be surprised by in the years to come is how some smart cookies bend and morph the modes into something new and better.</p>
<p>In other words, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll still be using gmail in 5 years time &#8230;. but it won&#8217;t be a &#8220;mail client&#8221; in the sense we understand it today. </p>
<p>Perhaps another interesting question is whether I&#8217;ll still have a _corporate_ &#8220;mail&#8221; facility in 5-10 years time..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>This is good stuff. I&#039;m glad to get everyone&#039;s feedback. It seems I&#039;m in the minority, but that&#039;s fine. Glad people are taking part in the discussion.

Keanu love the pithy observation. Funny too, considering the future me email service reminded me of your namesake in Bill &amp; Ted&#039;s. &quot;Remember a trashcan.&quot;  Good stuff.

Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good stuff. I&#8217;m glad to get everyone&#8217;s feedback. It seems I&#8217;m in the minority, but that&#8217;s fine. Glad people are taking part in the discussion.</p>
<p>Keanu love the pithy observation. Funny too, considering the future me email service reminded me of your namesake in Bill &#038; Ted&#8217;s. &#8220;Remember a trashcan.&#8221;  Good stuff.</p>
<p>Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-15141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-15141</guid>
		<description>This is good stuff. I&#039;m glad to get everyone&#039;s feedback. It seems I&#039;m in the minority, but that&#039;s fine. Glad people are taking part in the discussion.

Keanu love the pithy observation. Funny too, considering the future me email service reminded me of your namesake in Bill &amp; Ted&#039;s. &quot;Remember a trashcan.&quot;  Good stuff.

Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good stuff. I&#8217;m glad to get everyone&#8217;s feedback. It seems I&#8217;m in the minority, but that&#8217;s fine. Glad people are taking part in the discussion.</p>
<p>Keanu love the pithy observation. Funny too, considering the future me email service reminded me of your namesake in Bill &amp; Ted&#8217;s. &#8220;Remember a trashcan.&#8221;  Good stuff.</p>
<p>Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>I can see this working on &quot;stable&quot; networks, for example within a department, or across departments in a single company but I&#039;m still struggling to see how this might work in a sales situation.

If we took an example where there was a &quot;XYZ Supplier&quot; network who were trying to sell product FGH to customer ABC then how will the communication work and be filtered? Visibility is the big problem here because if it&#039;s done wrong then either XYZ Supplier would get to see all of ABC&#039;s internal messages, or perhaps even worse might then be considered &quot;within&quot; the network and so could talk to anyone in ABC. 

It doesn&#039;t mean that this is impossible, it&#039;s just that the movement of information across &quot;untrusted&quot; domains and relationships is a &quot;hard&quot; problem and it might take 3-5 years in order to get something that many business communities will actually put their trust into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see this working on &#8220;stable&#8221; networks, for example within a department, or across departments in a single company but I&#8217;m still struggling to see how this might work in a sales situation.</p>
<p>If we took an example where there was a &#8220;XYZ Supplier&#8221; network who were trying to sell product FGH to customer ABC then how will the communication work and be filtered? Visibility is the big problem here because if it&#8217;s done wrong then either XYZ Supplier would get to see all of ABC&#8217;s internal messages, or perhaps even worse might then be considered &#8220;within&#8221; the network and so could talk to anyone in ABC. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t mean that this is impossible, it&#8217;s just that the movement of information across &#8220;untrusted&#8221; domains and relationships is a &#8220;hard&#8221; problem and it might take 3-5 years in order to get something that many business communities will actually put their trust into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-15140</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2007/07/26/death-of-an-inbox/#comment-15140</guid>
		<description>I can see this working on &quot;stable&quot; networks, for example within a department, or across departments in a single company but I&#039;m still struggling to see how this might work in a sales situation.

If we took an example where there was a &quot;XYZ Supplier&quot; network who were trying to sell product FGH to customer ABC then how will the communication work and be filtered? Visibility is the big problem here because if it&#039;s done wrong then either XYZ Supplier would get to see all of ABC&#039;s internal messages, or perhaps even worse might then be considered &quot;within&quot; the network and so could talk to anyone in ABC. 

It doesn&#039;t mean that this is impossible, it&#039;s just that the movement of information across &quot;untrusted&quot; domains and relationships is a &quot;hard&quot; problem and it might take 3-5 years in order to get something that many business communities will actually put their trust into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see this working on &#8220;stable&#8221; networks, for example within a department, or across departments in a single company but I&#8217;m still struggling to see how this might work in a sales situation.</p>
<p>If we took an example where there was a &#8220;XYZ Supplier&#8221; network who were trying to sell product FGH to customer ABC then how will the communication work and be filtered? Visibility is the big problem here because if it&#8217;s done wrong then either XYZ Supplier would get to see all of ABC&#8217;s internal messages, or perhaps even worse might then be considered &#8220;within&#8221; the network and so could talk to anyone in ABC. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t mean that this is impossible, it&#8217;s just that the movement of information across &#8220;untrusted&#8221; domains and relationships is a &#8220;hard&#8221; problem and it might take 3-5 years in order to get something that many business communities will actually put their trust into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

