Comments on: Mix Rake Stats

By: Artem Vasiliev

Artem Vasiliev — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:27:43 +0000

Thank you, this was interesting!
I thought the Mix is smaller.. and impressed by the code/test ratio )

By: Rich Manalang

Rich Manalang — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:56:10 +0000

bex, rake stats just counts the pure ruby code, irregardless of what it’s running under (MRI or JRuby). It’s a count of how much code we actually wrote.

By: Jake

Jake — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:27:14 +0000

If you want the Mix code to be opened, vote for this idea:
https://mix.oracle.com/ideas/open-source-mix-code

By: bex

bex — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:02:32 +0000

That rule might not apply for JRuby… Or should I say, “all benchmarks lie”?

In JRuby, one line in the ‘model’ might represent an invocation of one hundred lines of Java.

Unless rake stats are smart enough to follow invoked Java code, count lines, and add that to the report… in which case, I’m impressed

By: Rich Manalang

Rich Manalang — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:58:41 +0000

We’re familiar with the credo. Don’t let the numbers fool you. Our controllers are actually pretty skinny (and our models are pretty fat). We just have lots of controller actions. And… to by honest, there’s quite a bit of refactoring to be done.

If we ever open source the code, you’ll see.

By: Raimonds

Raimonds — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:56:21 +0000

Rails mantra is “fat models and skinny controllers” In your case controllers seem to be more fat than models. Why is it so?

By: Rich Manalang - FriendFeed

Rich Manalang - FriendFeed — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

postedMix Rake Statson Oracle AppsLab