<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise Clouds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappslab.com/2009/08/21/enterprise-clouds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappslab.com/2009/08/21/enterprise-clouds/</link>
	<description>Driving Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:43:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2009/08/21/enterprise-clouds/comment-page-3/#comment-9473</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/?p=3339#comment-9473</guid>
		<description>Completely agree that corporate IT is trying to close the barn door after the cows have been using cloud services for a long time. That was fun.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You know there are cases where a private cloud is the only way to provide services too, e.g. testing new software releases or building internal apps on software your company builds. So, I&#039;m not sure why you&#039;re calling that conservative.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s just not possible for every enterprise to go full cloud, and a private cloud is a really good option that, frankly, is a better one in a lot of cases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Corporate OpenID may be the way to go eventually, but it still has an uphill battle in the consumer world to win first. Maybe the US government&#039;s steps to adopt will help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree that corporate IT is trying to close the barn door after the cows have been using cloud services for a long time. That was fun.</p>
<p>You know there are cases where a private cloud is the only way to provide services too, e.g. testing new software releases or building internal apps on software your company builds. So, I&#39;m not sure why you&#39;re calling that conservative.</p>
<p>It&#39;s just not possible for every enterprise to go full cloud, and a private cloud is a really good option that, frankly, is a better one in a lot of cases.</p>
<p>Corporate OpenID may be the way to go eventually, but it still has an uphill battle in the consumer world to win first. Maybe the US government&#39;s steps to adopt will help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tardate</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2009/08/21/enterprise-clouds/comment-page-3/#comment-9472</link>
		<dc:creator>tardate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/?p=3339#comment-9472</guid>
		<description>HI Jake. I&#039;m still not convinced by the private cloud argument. It epitomises the kind of conservative, minimise-the-change-and-risk thinking that is the real disease in corporate life that guarantees suboptimal performance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I&#039;m also a realist - right now, the concerns about trust and reliability are quite valid given the immaturity of the domain, but I think that does not mean we shouldn&#039;t still have our eyes raised towards the ideal end-state goal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the issues you&#039;ve identified are valid, but the reaction - moving to a private cloud infrastructure, hence control - misses the mark in terms of the longer term objective of positioning your IT organisation to fully exploit the cloud services becoming increasingly available (_not_ aim to replicate it all themselves inside the firewall).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I think the core issue concerns authentication and access control infrastructure. Issues such as where data resides (ignoring for a minute some regulatory constraints) are subsidiary once you have control of the authentication and access control process.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The big issue that corporate IT needs to be hot on right now is that external cloud services _are_ being used for business (no matter what your policies say). And mostly, employees are using personal login credentials for these services. A big security and compliance nightmare. What should Corporate IT do? Getting control means providing some way of enabling corporate identities to be exported on the web (so when I login to google docs, I use my corporate OpenID, not my personal account for example).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve been spruiking the idea for a while with some positive feedback (definitely not a tidal wave) - for the latest see &lt;a href=&quot;http://tardate.blogspot.com/2009/09/opx-almost-but-not-quite-what-we-need.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tardate.blogspot.com/2009/09/opx-almost-...&lt;/a&gt; - interested in your thoughts;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Jake. I&#39;m still not convinced by the private cloud argument. It epitomises the kind of conservative, minimise-the-change-and-risk thinking that is the real disease in corporate life that guarantees suboptimal performance.</p>
<p>But I&#39;m also a realist &#8211; right now, the concerns about trust and reliability are quite valid given the immaturity of the domain, but I think that does not mean we shouldn&#39;t still have our eyes raised towards the ideal end-state goal.</p>
<p>I think the issues you&#39;ve identified are valid, but the reaction &#8211; moving to a private cloud infrastructure, hence control &#8211; misses the mark in terms of the longer term objective of positioning your IT organisation to fully exploit the cloud services becoming increasingly available (_not_ aim to replicate it all themselves inside the firewall).</p>
<p>Personally, I think the core issue concerns authentication and access control infrastructure. Issues such as where data resides (ignoring for a minute some regulatory constraints) are subsidiary once you have control of the authentication and access control process.</p>
<p>The big issue that corporate IT needs to be hot on right now is that external cloud services _are_ being used for business (no matter what your policies say). And mostly, employees are using personal login credentials for these services. A big security and compliance nightmare. What should Corporate IT do? Getting control means providing some way of enabling corporate identities to be exported on the web (so when I login to google docs, I use my corporate OpenID, not my personal account for example).</p>
<p>I&#39;ve been spruiking the idea for a while with some positive feedback (definitely not a tidal wave) &#8211; for the latest see <a href="http://tardate.blogspot.com/2009/09/opx-almost-but-not-quite-what-we-need.html" rel="nofollow">http://tardate.blogspot.com/2009/09/opx-almost-&#8230;</a> &#8211; interested in your thoughts;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2009/08/21/enterprise-clouds/comment-page-3/#comment-9357</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/?p=3339#comment-9357</guid>
		<description>Completely agree that corporate IT is trying to close the barn door after the cows have been using cloud services for a long time. That was fun.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You know there are cases where a private cloud is the only way to provide services too, e.g. testing new software releases or building internal apps on software your company builds. So, I&#039;m not sure why you&#039;re calling that conservative.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s just not possible for every enterprise to go full cloud, and a private cloud is a really good option that, frankly, is a better one in a lot of cases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Corporate OpenID may be the way to go eventually, but it still has an uphill battle in the consumer world to win first. Maybe the US government&#039;s steps to adopt will help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree that corporate IT is trying to close the barn door after the cows have been using cloud services for a long time. That was fun.</p>
<p>You know there are cases where a private cloud is the only way to provide services too, e.g. testing new software releases or building internal apps on software your company builds. So, I&#39;m not sure why you&#39;re calling that conservative.</p>
<p>It&#39;s just not possible for every enterprise to go full cloud, and a private cloud is a really good option that, frankly, is a better one in a lot of cases.</p>
<p>Corporate OpenID may be the way to go eventually, but it still has an uphill battle in the consumer world to win first. Maybe the US government&#39;s steps to adopt will help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tardate</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2009/08/21/enterprise-clouds/comment-page-3/#comment-9354</link>
		<dc:creator>tardate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/?p=3339#comment-9354</guid>
		<description>HI Jake. I&#039;m still not convinced by the private cloud argument. It epitomises the kind of conservative, minimise-the-change-and-risk thinking that is the real disease in corporate life that guarantees suboptimal performance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I&#039;m also a realist - right now, the concerns about trust and reliability are quite valid given the immaturity of the domain, but I think that does not mean we shouldn&#039;t still have our eyes raised towards the ideal end-state goal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the issues you&#039;ve identified are valid, but the reaction - moving to a private cloud infrastructure, hence control - misses the mark in terms of the longer term objective of positioning your IT organisation to fully exploit the cloud services becoming increasingly available (_not_ aim to replicate it all themselves inside the firewall).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I think the core issue concerns authentication and access control infrastructure. Issues such as where data resides (ignoring for a minute some regulatory constraints) are subsidiary once you have control of the authentication and access control process.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The big issue that corporate IT needs to be hot on right now is that external cloud services _are_ being used for business (no matter what your policies say). And mostly, employees are using personal login credentials for these services. A big security and compliance nightmare. What should Corporate IT do? Getting control means providing some way of enabling corporate identities to be exported on the web (so when I login to google docs, I use my corporate OpenID, not my personal account for example).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve been spruiking the idea for a while with some positive feedback (definitely not a tidal wave) - for the latest see &lt;a href=&quot;http://tardate.blogspot.com/2009/09/opx-almost-but-not-quite-what-we-need.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tardate.blogspot.com/2009/09/opx-almost-...&lt;/a&gt; - interested in your thoughts;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Jake. I&#39;m still not convinced by the private cloud argument. It epitomises the kind of conservative, minimise-the-change-and-risk thinking that is the real disease in corporate life that guarantees suboptimal performance.</p>
<p>But I&#39;m also a realist &#8211; right now, the concerns about trust and reliability are quite valid given the immaturity of the domain, but I think that does not mean we shouldn&#39;t still have our eyes raised towards the ideal end-state goal.</p>
<p>I think the issues you&#39;ve identified are valid, but the reaction &#8211; moving to a private cloud infrastructure, hence control &#8211; misses the mark in terms of the longer term objective of positioning your IT organisation to fully exploit the cloud services becoming increasingly available (_not_ aim to replicate it all themselves inside the firewall).</p>
<p>Personally, I think the core issue concerns authentication and access control infrastructure. Issues such as where data resides (ignoring for a minute some regulatory constraints) are subsidiary once you have control of the authentication and access control process.</p>
<p>The big issue that corporate IT needs to be hot on right now is that external cloud services _are_ being used for business (no matter what your policies say). And mostly, employees are using personal login credentials for these services. A big security and compliance nightmare. What should Corporate IT do? Getting control means providing some way of enabling corporate identities to be exported on the web (so when I login to google docs, I use my corporate OpenID, not my personal account for example).</p>
<p>I&#39;ve been spruiking the idea for a while with some positive feedback (definitely not a tidal wave) &#8211; for the latest see <a href="http://tardate.blogspot.com/2009/09/opx-almost-but-not-quite-what-we-need.html" rel="nofollow">http://tardate.blogspot.com/2009/09/opx-almost-&#8230;</a> &#8211; interested in your thoughts;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2009/08/21/enterprise-clouds/comment-page-3/#comment-9323</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/?p=3339#comment-9323</guid>
		<description>Everyone would benefit from flexible infrastructure, but I think the startup costs generally keep IT cautious. I&#039;ll ask around, but I&#039;m not confident anyone will talk to me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone would benefit from flexible infrastructure, but I think the startup costs generally keep IT cautious. I&#39;ll ask around, but I&#39;m not confident anyone will talk to me <img src='http://theappslab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sreyadutta</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2009/08/21/enterprise-clouds/comment-page-3/#comment-9319</link>
		<dc:creator>sreyadutta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/?p=3339#comment-9319</guid>
		<description>Hi Jake, this is what I was asking for as well. I like the term enterprise clouds and I hope Oracle does something in this direction. I&#039;ve actually heard at random that Oracle did have a plan of a private cloud for Oracle. You should push up your chain and I am trying from my team as well. Thanks for the thoughts and the simple examples you used to justify your thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jake, this is what I was asking for as well. I like the term enterprise clouds and I hope Oracle does something in this direction. I&#39;ve actually heard at random that Oracle did have a plan of a private cloud for Oracle. You should push up your chain and I am trying from my team as well. Thanks for the thoughts and the simple examples you used to justify your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Is This? &#124; Oracle</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2009/08/21/enterprise-clouds/comment-page-2/#comment-9211</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is This? &#124; Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/?p=3339#comment-9211</guid>
		<description>[...] Friday here, so I figure why waste any brainpower on a thoughtful post that won&#8217;t get read. I learned that last Friday, or maybe you all just don&#8217;t care about enterprise/private [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday here, so I figure why waste any brainpower on a thoughtful post that won&#8217;t get read. I learned that last Friday, or maybe you all just don&#8217;t care about enterprise/private [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWS Virtual Private Clouds &#124; Oracle</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2009/08/21/enterprise-clouds/comment-page-2/#comment-9210</link>
		<dc:creator>AWS Virtual Private Clouds &#124; Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/?p=3339#comment-9210</guid>
		<description>[...] like I&#8217;m not the only one who thinks enterprises will pay for their own cloud-based infrastructure. Today, Amazon Web Services announced [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like I&#8217;m not the only one who thinks enterprises will pay for their own cloud-based infrastructure. Today, Amazon Web Services announced [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chet</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2009/08/21/enterprise-clouds/comment-page-1/#comment-16325</link>
		<dc:creator>chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/?p=3339#comment-16325</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of a cloud-type-thingy inside the firewall.  Never thought of it that way.

I&#039;ve been to a couple of these virtualization pitches recently, one for desktops and one for the data-center.  Pretty cool stuff.  I think it&#039;s perfectly applicable here...you&#039;ll get innovation if you give your employees (individually or groups/departments) the freedom to tinker.  Doesn&#039;t Google do 20% of your time?

It&#039;s probably why I like your group...small, nimble and jumps tall buildings in a single bound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of a cloud-type-thingy inside the firewall.  Never thought of it that way.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been to a couple of these virtualization pitches recently, one for desktops and one for the data-center.  Pretty cool stuff.  I think it&#8217;s perfectly applicable here&#8230;you&#8217;ll get innovation if you give your employees (individually or groups/departments) the freedom to tinker.  Doesn&#8217;t Google do 20% of your time?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably why I like your group&#8230;small, nimble and jumps tall buildings in a single bound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

