<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These Are Our Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/</link>
	<description>Driving Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:43:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiffany jewelry</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-14078</link>
		<dc:creator>tiffany jewelry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-14078</guid>
		<description>Testing, not navel-gazing I promise ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testing, not navel-gazing I promise <img src='http://theappslab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-13142</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-13142</guid>
		<description>Nice. Thank you for the link love. Have you seen letmegooglethatforyou.com? Snarky? Yes, but sometimes applicable. Even though we should &lt;3 our users, it&#039;s often tough love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. Thank you for the link love. Have you seen letmegooglethatforyou.com? Snarky? Yes, but sometimes applicable. Even though we should &lt;3 our users, it&#39;s often tough love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-13141</link>
		<dc:creator>John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-13141</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s now June, and someone on FriendFeed (with a private feed, so I&#039;m not linking to the FriendFeed item) just wrote, &quot;Told someone to go to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.website.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.website.com&lt;/a&gt;. He loaded Google, put the info in search box, then clicked on the link in search results. Uhm, huh?&quot; Someone replied to the original writer by mentioning this whole &quot;Facebook login&quot; thing. Again a reminder that computers are hard. (And yes, I added a link to this post to help put things in perspective.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s now June, and someone on FriendFeed (with a private feed, so I&#39;m not linking to the FriendFeed item) just wrote, &#8220;Told someone to go to <a href="http://www.website.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.website.com</a>. He loaded Google, put the info in search box, then clicked on the link in search results. Uhm, huh?&#8221; Someone replied to the original writer by mentioning this whole &#8220;Facebook login&#8221; thing. Again a reminder that computers are hard. (And yes, I added a link to this post to help put things in perspective.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-12857</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 02:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-12857</guid>
		<description>Nice. Thank you for the link love. Have you seen letmegooglethatforyou.com? Snarky? Yes, but sometimes applicable. Even though we should &lt;3 our users, it&#039;s often tough love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. Thank you for the link love. Have you seen letmegooglethatforyou.com? Snarky? Yes, but sometimes applicable. Even though we should &lt;3 our users, it&#39;s often tough love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-12838</link>
		<dc:creator>John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 01:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-12838</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s now June, and someone on FriendFeed (with a private feed, so I&#039;m not linking to the FriendFeed item) just wrote, &quot;Told someone to go to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.website.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.website.com&lt;/a&gt;. He loaded Google, put the info in search box, then clicked on the link in search results. Uhm, huh?&quot; Someone replied to the original writer by mentioning this whole &quot;Facebook login&quot; thing. Again a reminder that computers are hard. (And yes, I added a link to this post to help put things in perspective.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s now June, and someone on FriendFeed (with a private feed, so I&#39;m not linking to the FriendFeed item) just wrote, &#8220;Told someone to go to <a href="http://www.website.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.website.com</a>. He loaded Google, put the info in search box, then clicked on the link in search results. Uhm, huh?&#8221; Someone replied to the original writer by mentioning this whole &#8220;Facebook login&#8221; thing. Again a reminder that computers are hard. (And yes, I added a link to this post to help put things in perspective.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do you use Google as your address bar? &#171; Jeffrey Kemp&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-12018</link>
		<dc:creator>Do you use Google as your address bar? &#171; Jeffrey Kemp&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-12018</guid>
		<description>[...] This fact caught out quite a few people earlier this year, who were in the habit of logging into Facebook via Google: http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This fact caught out quite a few people earlier this year, who were in the habit of logging into Facebook via Google: http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Empathy as Design Value &#124; Oracle</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11686</link>
		<dc:creator>Empathy as Design Value &#124; Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11686</guid>
		<description>[...] surprisingly, the ReadWriteWeb/Facebook login fiasco came afoot because an exponent during the session. This is an exponent of acuteness ingrained, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] surprisingly, the ReadWriteWeb/Facebook login fiasco came afoot because an exponent during the session. This is an exponent of acuteness ingrained, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11658</link>
		<dc:creator>John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11658</guid>
		<description>Alan, I&#039;ve seen the three comments that you left this afternoon (two to Jake, and one to myself). Both Jake and I work for software developers, and when you&#039;re trying to sell software, you need to make sure that your software fits the needs of your customers. You don&#039;t have the luxury of forcing your customers to fit the needs of your software. Imagine if Apple customers had to have the technical understanding of Steve Wozniak; if that were the case, there would be no Apple customers. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As time has passed, computers have become better and better as labor-saving devices - which is, after all, what they are supposed to be. But the whole &quot;Facebook login&quot; think has proven that the computers that we think are so intuitive are anything but.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for intelligence, Jake put it very succinctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, I&#39;ve seen the three comments that you left this afternoon (two to Jake, and one to myself). Both Jake and I work for software developers, and when you&#39;re trying to sell software, you need to make sure that your software fits the needs of your customers. You don&#39;t have the luxury of forcing your customers to fit the needs of your software. Imagine if Apple customers had to have the technical understanding of Steve Wozniak; if that were the case, there would be no Apple customers. </p>
<p>As time has passed, computers have become better and better as labor-saving devices &#8211; which is, after all, what they are supposed to be. But the whole &#8220;Facebook login&#8221; think has proven that the computers that we think are so intuitive are anything but.</p>
<p>As for intelligence, Jake put it very succinctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11654</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11654</guid>
		<description>Again, assuming you&#039;re talking to me. Devote is a stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, assuming you&#39;re talking to me. Devote is a stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11655</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11655</guid>
		<description>I assume you&#039;re talking to me. Intelligence is not proven or disproven by the ability to use a computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you&#39;re talking to me. Intelligence is not proven or disproven by the ability to use a computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Simpson</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11652</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11652</guid>
		<description>Right. Others devote their lives to studying and working and researching and inventing. And you devote your life to cheap meaningless babble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. Others devote their lives to studying and working and researching and inventing. And you devote your life to cheap meaningless babble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Simpson</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11653</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11653</guid>
		<description>Why do you expect the intelligent hard working people to cater to the lazy stupid ones? Who do you think you are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you expect the intelligent hard working people to cater to the lazy stupid ones? Who do you think you are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Simpson</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11651</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11651</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the dumbest thing I&#039;ve ever heard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s the dumbest thing I&#39;ve ever heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11393</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11393</guid>
		<description>Interesting post and very detailed. I knew most of the high-level stuff already, but appreciate the deep dive. Also, couldn&#039;t miss the MSFT bias :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not surprised there are dubious sites sitting on the &quot;facebook login&quot; keywords. That&#039;s classic search manipulation. I&#039;m sure there are also malicious sites that spoof FB Connect and phish for credentials.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Re. fault, Google does more to point out suspect links now, plus the browsers help too. I&#039;m guessing Facebook does their part too to keep their pages high on PageRank. The sad thing is no one *has* to do anything. Like 419 scams, phishing, etc., this is a &quot;thar be dragons&quot; problem; it&#039;s the user&#039;s fault.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not that I don&#039;t feel bad, technology should be easier, but it&#039;s not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post and very detailed. I knew most of the high-level stuff already, but appreciate the deep dive. Also, couldn&#39;t miss the MSFT bias <img src='http://theappslab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#39;m not surprised there are dubious sites sitting on the &#8220;facebook login&#8221; keywords. That&#39;s classic search manipulation. I&#39;m sure there are also malicious sites that spoof FB Connect and phish for credentials.</p>
<p>Re. fault, Google does more to point out suspect links now, plus the browsers help too. I&#39;m guessing Facebook does their part too to keep their pages high on PageRank. The sad thing is no one *has* to do anything. Like 419 scams, phishing, etc., this is a &#8220;thar be dragons&#8221; problem; it&#39;s the user&#39;s fault.</p>
<p>Not that I don&#39;t feel bad, technology should be easier, but it&#39;s not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: empoprises (John E. Bredehoft)</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11388</link>
		<dc:creator>empoprises (John E. Bredehoft)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11388</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Twitter Comment&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/empoprises&quot; title=&quot;Twitter Comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;ccimg1&quot; title=&quot;empoprises (John E. Bredehoft)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;img name=&quot;cc_image&quot; title=&quot;empoprises (John E. Bredehoft)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;&quot; src=&quot;http://purl.org/net/spiurl/empoprises&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
RE: @jkuramot Eddie Awad linked to an Igor Ovstrosky post that looked at what happens under the hood when you navigate… [link to post]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://chatcatcher.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Posted using Chat Catcher&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter Comment</strong><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/empoprises" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"></p>
<div class="ccimg1" title="empoprises (John E. Bredehoft)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;">
<img name="cc_image" title="empoprises (John E. Bredehoft)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;" src="http://purl.org/net/spiurl/empoprises"/>
</div>
<p></a><br />
RE: @jkuramot Eddie Awad linked to an Igor Ovstrosky post that looked at what happens under the hood when you navigate… [link to post]</p>
<p> &#8211; <a href="http://chatcatcher.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Posted using Chat Catcher</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: empoprises (John E. Bredehoft)</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11390</link>
		<dc:creator>empoprises (John E. Bredehoft)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11390</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Twitter Comment&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/empoprises&quot; title=&quot;Twitter Comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;code class=&quot;ccimg1&quot; title=&quot;empoprises (John E. Bredehoft)&quot; style=&quot;background: url(http://purl.org/net/spiurl/empoprises) no-repeat;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;RE: @jkuramot Eddie Awad linked to an Igor Ovstrosky post that looked at what happens under the hood when you navigate… [link to post]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://chatcatcher.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Posted using Chat Catcher&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter Comment</strong><br /><a href="http://twitter.com/empoprises" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"><br /><code class="ccimg1" title="empoprises (John E. Bredehoft)" style="background: url(http://purl.org/net/spiurl/empoprises) no-repeat;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;"></p>
<p></code><br /></a><br />RE: @jkuramot Eddie Awad linked to an Igor Ovstrosky post that looked at what happens under the hood when you navigate… [link to post]</p>
<p> &#8211; <a href="http://chatcatcher.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Posted using Chat Catcher</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11389</link>
		<dc:creator>John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11389</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://awads.net/wp/2010/02/22/what-really-happens-when-you-navigate-to-a-url/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eddie Awad linked&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://igoro.com/archive/what-really-happens-when-you-navigate-to-a-url/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an Igor Ovstrosky post&lt;/a&gt; that looked at what happens under the hood when you navigate to a particular URL. The URL in the example? &lt;a href=&quot;http://facebook.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;facebook.com&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Today (February 22) I re-executed the Google search for &quot;Facebook login&quot; to see if the order of the search results had changed. The RWW article is currently 9th on the list, and Facebook itself appears as the first item in the list. So someone, either at Facebook or at Google, got their act together. (Or maybe the RWW article had declined on its own as it became more dated.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interestingly enough, result number 3 is a site called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebookloginhut.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.facebookloginhut.com/&lt;/a&gt; that presents news about Facebook, surrounded by a bunch of ads (&quot;Meet the Hottest Singles on Zoosk!&quot;). Oh, and down on the right side of the page is a &quot;Join me @ FB&quot; button with the Facebook logo on it. And one of the comments on one of the posts leads to a site called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebookloginnow.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.facebookloginnow.com/&lt;/a&gt; - interesting. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least the ReadWriteWeb redirect was an honest mistake. &lt;a href=&quot;http://facebooklogin%5Bwhatever%5D.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;facebooklogin[whatever].com&lt;/a&gt; does not appear to be malicious, but the sites are obviously designed to appear high in specific search results. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What happens if someone has true malicious intent and harvests passwords and other information from people who think they&#039;re logging in to a redesigned Facebook? Do we blame the so-called &quot;stupid&quot; users who don&#039;t know enough to type hppt;; or htpt)) or whatever in the heck it is, or do we blame Facebook for not optimizing its page for search, or do we blame Google/Bing et al for sending us to the wrong site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://awads.net/wp/2010/02/22/what-really-happens-when-you-navigate-to-a-url/" rel="nofollow">Eddie Awad linked</a> to <a href="http://igoro.com/archive/what-really-happens-when-you-navigate-to-a-url/" rel="nofollow">an Igor Ovstrosky post</a> that looked at what happens under the hood when you navigate to a particular URL. The URL in the example? <a href="http://facebook.com" rel="nofollow">facebook.com</a>. </p>
<p>Today (February 22) I re-executed the Google search for &#8220;Facebook login&#8221; to see if the order of the search results had changed. The RWW article is currently 9th on the list, and Facebook itself appears as the first item in the list. So someone, either at Facebook or at Google, got their act together. (Or maybe the RWW article had declined on its own as it became more dated.)</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, result number 3 is a site called <a href="http://www.facebookloginhut.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebookloginhut.com/</a> that presents news about Facebook, surrounded by a bunch of ads (&#8220;Meet the Hottest Singles on Zoosk!&#8221;). Oh, and down on the right side of the page is a &#8220;Join me @ FB&#8221; button with the Facebook logo on it. And one of the comments on one of the posts leads to a site called <a href="http://www.facebookloginnow.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebookloginnow.com/</a> &#8211; interesting. </p>
<p>At least the ReadWriteWeb redirect was an honest mistake. <a href="http://facebooklogin%5Bwhatever%5D.com" rel="nofollow">facebooklogin[whatever].com</a> does not appear to be malicious, but the sites are obviously designed to appear high in specific search results. </p>
<p>What happens if someone has true malicious intent and harvests passwords and other information from people who think they&#39;re logging in to a redesigned Facebook? Do we blame the so-called &#8220;stupid&#8221; users who don&#39;t know enough to type hppt;; or htpt)) or whatever in the heck it is, or do we blame Facebook for not optimizing its page for search, or do we blame Google/Bing et al for sending us to the wrong site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11387</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11387</guid>
		<description>Sorry for your inconvenience :) I still &lt;3 the fact that RWW&#039;s SEO pwned Facebook. Classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for your inconvenience <img src='http://theappslab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I still &lt;3 the fact that RWW&#39;s SEO pwned Facebook. Classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11385</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11385</guid>
		<description>I am confused and angry... I keep trying to get to my website I created about how &quot;Computers make me feel stupid&quot; but google keeps bringing me to this page!!  Did you redesign my webite?!   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt; jk  :P  sry couldn&#039;t help maself &gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confused and angry&#8230; I keep trying to get to my website I created about how &#8220;Computers make me feel stupid&#8221; but google keeps bringing me to this page!!  Did you redesign my webite?!   </p>
<p>&lt; jk  <img src='http://theappslab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />   sry couldn&#39;t help maself &gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/comment-page-1/#comment-11316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappslab.com/2010/02/11/these-are-our-users/#comment-11316</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not proposing that behavior. It&#039;s fact. People use Google to find base domains vs. entering them in the location bar. I&#039;ve seen this numerous times from non-technical people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, to many, Google *is* a glorified address bar.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides, I disagree that the entire point of search engines is to change and find popular content. The original requirement for a search engine was to provide a directory of the Internet. Google added the popular and new dimensions with PageRank, making them enhancements to the original purpose.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another funny piece here is that RWW&#039;s SEO defeated Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not proposing that behavior. It&#39;s fact. People use Google to find base domains vs. entering them in the location bar. I&#39;ve seen this numerous times from non-technical people.</p>
<p>So, to many, Google *is* a glorified address bar.</p>
<p>Besides, I disagree that the entire point of search engines is to change and find popular content. The original requirement for a search engine was to provide a directory of the Internet. Google added the popular and new dimensions with PageRank, making them enhancements to the original purpose.</p>
<p>Another funny piece here is that RWW&#39;s SEO defeated Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

