Mix Rake Stats

By Rich Manalang • November 27th, 2007 • 13 Comments

Artem Vasiliev asked for the Mix rake stats… here they are:

+----------------------+-------+-------+---------+---------+-----+-------+
| Name                 | Lines |   LOC | Classes | Methods | M/C | LOC/M |
+----------------------+-------+-------+---------+---------+-----+-------+
| Controllers          |  1825 |  1504 |      22 |     145 |   6 |     8 |
| Helpers              |   248 |   217 |       0 |      28 |   0 |     5 |
| Models               |   976 |   802 |      20 |     105 |   5 |     5 |
| Libraries            |   463 |   364 |       7 |      45 |   6 |     6 |
| Components           |     0 |     0 |       0 |       0 |   0 |     0 |
| Integration tests    |     0 |     0 |       0 |       0 |   0 |     0 |
| Functional tests     |  3904 |  3087 |      24 |      89 |   3 |    32 |
| Unit tests           |   771 |   604 |       1 |      10 |  10 |    58 |
+----------------------+-------+-------+---------+---------+-----+-------+
| Total                |  8187 |  6578 |      74 |     422 |   5 |    13 |
+----------------------+-------+-------+---------+---------+-----+-------+
  Code LOC: 2887     Test LOC: 3691     Code to Test Ratio: 1:1.3

Possibly Related Posts

  • Pingback: Rich Manalang - FriendFeed

  • http://blog.rayapps.com Raimonds

    Rails mantra is “fat models and skinny controllers” :) In your case controllers seem to be more fat than models. Why is it so?

  • http://blog.rayapps.com Raimonds

    Rails mantra is “fat models and skinny controllers” :) In your case controllers seem to be more fat than models. Why is it so?

  • http://manalang.com Rich Manalang

    We’re familiar with the credo. Don’t let the numbers fool you. Our controllers are actually pretty skinny (and our models are pretty fat). We just have lots of controller actions. And… to by honest, there’s quite a bit of refactoring to be done.

    If we ever open source the code, you’ll see.

  • http://manalang.com Rich Manalang

    We’re familiar with the credo. Don’t let the numbers fool you. Our controllers are actually pretty skinny (and our models are pretty fat). We just have lots of controller actions. And… to by honest, there’s quite a bit of refactoring to be done.

    If we ever open source the code, you’ll see.

  • http://bexhuff.com bex

    That rule might not apply for JRuby… Or should I say, “all benchmarks lie”?

    In JRuby, one line in the ‘model’ might represent an invocation of one hundred lines of Java.

    Unless rake stats are smart enough to follow invoked Java code, count lines, and add that to the report… in which case, I’m impressed ;-)

  • http://bexhuff.com bex

    That rule might not apply for JRuby… Or should I say, “all benchmarks lie”?

    In JRuby, one line in the ‘model’ might represent an invocation of one hundred lines of Java.

    Unless rake stats are smart enough to follow invoked Java code, count lines, and add that to the report… in which case, I’m impressed ;-)

  • Jake

    If you want the Mix code to be opened, vote for this idea:
    https://mix.oracle.com/ideas/open-source-mix-code

  • Jake

    If you want the Mix code to be opened, vote for this idea:
    https://mix.oracle.com/ideas/open-source-mix-code

  • http://manalang.com Rich Manalang

    bex, rake stats just counts the pure ruby code, irregardless of what it’s running under (MRI or JRuby). It’s a count of how much code we actually wrote.

  • http://manalang.com Rich Manalang

    bex, rake stats just counts the pure ruby code, irregardless of what it’s running under (MRI or JRuby). It’s a count of how much code we actually wrote.

  • Anonymous

    Thank you, this was interesting!
    I thought the Mix is smaller.. and impressed by the code/test ratio )

  • Artem Vasiliev

    Thank you, this was interesting!
    I thought the Mix is smaller.. and impressed by the code/test ratio )