Vi Rules!

September 30th, 2008 View Comments

… and you know it.  I’m sure we have enough geeky readers here that know what I’m talking about.  For those that don’t (you suck) — Vi, simply put, is the best damn text editor ever created.

A couple of weeks ago a poll was started on OraTweet regarding Vi vs. Emacs:

How could there even be a comparison?  After all…

And for those who think TextMate is the best thing that they’ve ever installed on their macs, I say, “Vi still rules and Textmate is still €39 ≈ $57 — more than free.”

This post is nothing but a good ole fashion flamebait.  As I type this, I realize that the only reason I’m posting this is because I got a little too excited when MacVim (a very cool Vim app on OS X) added support for a mvim:// URL handler — now you know what excites me.  Anyway, since we’re at it… Gnome vs. KDE, Bash vs. Tcsh (or your pick)… fight back in the comments.


Possibly Related Posts

View Comments to “Vi Rules!”

  1. Noons Says:

    C vs C++ anyone?
    ;)

  2. Jessy Says:

    I'll have to go with KDE, Bash, and well pico/nano (yup I said it!)

  3. jpiwowar Says:

    Woohoo, flamebait for a Wednesday morning! ;-)

    Nothing beats vi for quick editing (except maybe a perl one-liner in some cases). I haven't used emacs regularly in over 10 years, but when i've been forced to use it, I've found that I can still be in and out of a couple of files with vi in the time it takes emacs to *start*.

    I'll admit to being a happy Textmate user, though. I like interface for grouping files into projects, and the robust collection of built-in shortcuts/hotkeys, particularly if I have to resort to hand-coded HTML. Sure, it's “not-free”-ware, but it's a quality app, and I'm not against paying for quality. :-)

  4. manalang Says:

    Pico/nano… you're kidding me. You might as well be a Notepad user.

  5. manalang Says:

    I actually like Textmate but hate that it's only on a Mac. I switch between linux and mac a lot and would prefer to have the same editor on both. Otherwise, I'd be a happy Textmate user myself.

  6. manalang Says:

    C baby

  7. manalang Says:

    Oh… and for the record… gnome and bash for me.

  8. Jake Says:

    How about Coke vs. Pepsi?

    Not that I use either very much anymore, but when I did, I always liked vi more b/c I felt like a keyboard rockstar using it, like using SQL*Plus over TOAD. Emacs and pico were too user-friendly.

    Interesting thread though. I think the real reason tools like vi and CLI in general are preferred by most geeks is that they're inaccessible to n00bs. There's a flamebait post there.

  9. Lori M Olson Says:

    My husband is a sysadmin, and I am a developer. We re-enact the Vi vs Emacs war every time we get a new server.

  10. Jake Says:

    Who wins?

  11. ontarioemperor Says:

    I used ed back in the day, so I guess that puts me in the vi camp. :)

  12. Lori M Olson Says:

    We both do, I guess. Vi comes pre-installed, but every time I log in to a new machine, and try to do something simple like edit my .profile, I yell loudly if emacs isn't there… so he has to install it for me ;-)

  13. Jake Says:

    Everybody wins if you have choices.

  14. megbear Says:

    :1, $ s/emacs/vi

    at least I *think* I remember a useful skill or two.

    You can find out all about how I learned vi here (http://talentedapps.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/fi...)

    ;-)

  15. David Haimes Says:

    I will still occasionally jump into a linux SQL*Plus session and rant about I can get the job done before TOAD/SQL Navigator has even loaded (the reality is, since my hard drive was replaced a few months ago, I never installed them).

  16. Jake Says:

    There's a lot to be said for lightweight tools that are fast and just work. Vi can be a chore though, but one worth doing/learning

Leave a Reply

blog comments powered by Disqus