Is the Venture Funding Model Broken?

Jerry Yang’s ignominious resignation as CEO of Yahoo this week further underlined for me what’s broken about the venture capital model.

I’m not referring to the slidedeck presented by Adeo Ressi to Harvard Business School faculty earlier this month, i.e. I don’t really care to cover what’s wrong with the investments made by VCs or the reasons they were made.

I’m talking about using the equity model for startups. By now, everyone has a working knowledge of the usual financial path a startup takes, assuming it successfully stays in business:

  1. Incubate an idea and stay self-funded as long as possible.
  2. Take small infusions from family and friends to keep the equity spread across people you trust and who trust you and have faith in you and your idea.
  3. Seek angel investment, further diluting the equity.
  4. Close a round of venture capital with probably a single firm, further shrinking equity.
  5. Retain employees by offering equity options in the event of a liquidity event.
  6. Close x number of additional venture capital rounds, adding more firms, possibly reupping an existing investor, all the while spreading equity to more parties.
  7. Contemplate a liquidity event, which requires the addition of an investment bank to the equity pool.
  8. Add more stakeholders when you close the liquidity event, typically in the form of publicly traded shares of your own company or of another company, i.e. in the event of a merger or acquisition.

What you end up with at the end of this path is a whole mess of people who, rightfully, demand to have a voice in your precious company’s affairs. Read More »

Connect for Your iPhone

As I teased earlier in the week, Rich has been cooking up Connect People Search for your iPhone. Last night, it went live.

This isn’t an iPhone app because, as we all know, there are a few issues preventing an app that requires behind the firewall access: 1) we can’t yet connect to VPN using the iPhone VPN client and 2) there’s no way (without jailbreaking) to put an app onto your iPhone without using iTunes, which means applying to the App Store and hoping Apple will approve.

Connect People Search is just that; people search optimized to run in Safari on the iPhone. Rich did several clever things to make this work.

First, he’s obviously not using the iPhone VPN client, but rather, another method provided by GIS. It’s not really a secret, just not as frequently used. So, before you can do anything, you’ll need to authenticate to VPN.

Once you’re in, you’re presented with a search box. Simply enter the string you want to query, just like in the full version of Connect, and off you go.

The results are constrained to people only, natch, and you can click through to view a person’s profile. No fuss, no mess. Read More »

Google Does and Knows a Lot

It’s pretty hard to keep up with all the stuff Google does. There are several blogs I know of whose only purpose in life is to cover Google.

Anyway, a couple noteworthy Google announcements recently caught my attention. So, I figured I share them and collect your thoughts.

Google Flu Trends
Google.org announced Google Flu Trends recently, which tracks aggregated search data to estimate flu activity in the US (and by state). So your search for any number of flu-related keywords alerts Google Flu Search to the possibility of an influenza rise in your state.

Pretty Orwellian, but cool. At first blush, the logic here sounded weak to me. After all, lots of Internet doctors exist out there (my wife is one), and this approach puts a fair amount of faith into a person’s ability to diagnose symptoms effectively.

Not to mention the fact that the usage of Google state-by-state may not represent a large enough sample to make these assumptions. So, interested, but skeptical, I dug more deeply.

Turns out this theory was tested last year, and it closely mirrors data collected by the CDC. Even more surprising to me is that the data generated by Google Flu Trends estimate with good accuracy the spread of flu, one to two weeks ahead of the CDC models.

Surprising to me and yet another example of what Google knows about us all. Read More »

Shizzow Expands Beyond the Rose City

I’ve mentioned Portland-based Shizzow a few times in the past in posts about geo-aware services and networking.

Shizzow has been open to Portlanders only until this week, but Tuesday they added the Bay Area. And now today, Seattle is also supported.

Full disclosure: I know all the principles that make up the little Shizzow operation. They’re all working on Shizzow as a side-project (read in addition to regular jobs), and they’re bootstrapping rather than taking outside money, a good call considering the current economy.

Oh yeah, what is Shizzow? It’s (another) geo-location social network. Its purpose is simplicity, born out of necessity. Portland has a huge nomadic geek population, bouncing around the many wi-fi coffeehouse and mobile working locations around town.

Shizzow’s goal is to make ad-hoc meetups and gatherings happen more easily. Rather than broadcasting the address of your current (or soon-to-be) location, Shizzow has a collection of human-understandable locations from which you can “shout”, e.g. if I’m at CubeSpace and I want to grab some lunch, I can shout my location as CubeSpace, rather than 622 SE Grand. Read More »

Found: Cool Stuff in Your Shared Items

So, I now have about five or six people sharing their Google Reader shared items with me, which is good.

These feeds function a lot like Twitter for me, i.e. the items in there are sometimes interesting and tend to tell me a bit about each person. For example, Paul shares a lot of gadget stuff from Gizmodo and Engadget, but mainly the vehicles, cameras, and AV stuff. This makes him my gadget filter for those items.

Rich shares mostly Rails posts (surprise) and some theory of development stuff. The Ontario Emperor shares a lot of political stuff. It’s an interesting way to learn about a person’s interests and to cross-pollinate them with your own.

Plus the recent addition of the notes feature to shared items lets you add specific thoughts to each item. Hmm, sounds a lot like blogging (or micro-blogging, to turn a phrase). I’ve not tested this, but I wonder if I share an item with comments that was shared with me if the comments also propagate. This would be equivalent to blog comments.

Case in point, two people shared this item about the Infinity Bookcase, which is a sweet design. I wonder how you physically get to the books inside each loop though.

I love design, form and function. So, now I’ve got a new resource (Make), and I know a bit more about these two Intertubes friends. Very cool stuff, classic network effects in action. Read More »

“Looks Good, Works Well”

Last night, I was lucky enough to see Bill Scott (of Yahoo Design Pattern Library, YUI, OpenRico, Netflix fame) present at my local Ruby user group.  He shared his thoughts about the successful design patterns that have defined today’s web.  As someone who enjoys brilliantly designed “things” including web apps and sites, I found his talk very interesting.

Designing Web Interfaces

View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: rich ajax)

Most (actually, all) of his talk was devoted to the consumer web.  My head is almost always focused on how to take the good stuff coming from the consumer web back into the enterprise web.  Bill’s ideas made me realize how little we (as enterprise web app developers) pay attention to the minute details that go into producing web apps that customers love.  Bill is currently the Director of UI Engineering at Netflix.  If you’re a Netflix customerfan, you’ll know that Netflix.com is a superb site.  Netflix’ business depends entirely on the success of its site.  Very small incremental changes could drastically affect their business.  All of the changes they make to the site go through rigorous testing with real users and are carefully measured. Read More »

More iPhone Apps

Here’s some more iPhone goodness, and a teaser to whet your appetite.

Fake Calls
Thanks to Floyd for this tip. I started out to review three fake call apps, but quickly realized there are a lot more than three. Eleven apps matched the keyword search “fake caller” in the App Store, and only one didn’t fit the search.

So, if you ever felt the need to fake a phone call to get out of a personal interaction (conversation, meeting, date, movie, etc.), you have ten iPhone apps to choose from:

  • Fake-a-Call (free)
  • Fake Calls ($0.99)
  • Fake Caller Free
  • Fake Call ($0.99)
  • Fake Caller Premium ($0.99)
  • GottaDash ($0.99)
  • GottaGo ($0.99)
  • exitstrategy ($0.99)
  • HottrixPhone PRO ($2.99)
  • Phony ($1.99)

This is really funny to me; until today, I had never thought of this as an app, and I can’t even recall using a fake phone call excuse to get out of a situation.

But now my eyes are open, and from now on, I’ll be suspicious when someone with an iPhone gets a call and bails on a meeting or a conversation with me. The end of innocence I guess.

The question is do these fake call apps make the iPhone more “for business”?

Teaser: Rich has been tinkering with iPhone development. Stay tuned for more on what he’s doing.

Who Owns Your Address Book?

Friend of the ‘Lab Dan McCall sent this post my way last week.

The issue in question is whether your LinkedIn contacts could be considered the property of your employer, should you decide to part ways.

This is an intriguing question, considering:

  • LinkedIn’s self-described purpose as a “professional network”.
  • People use LinkedIn to keep track of their business contacts, sometimes from work computers.
  • Most networks on LinkedIn include a hodge-podge of contacts, friends and acquaintances made at various points during a person’s career both at the current employer and at prior employers.

I did some digging, and it seems there has already been some precedent established, at least in the UK. That case seemed to hinge on the timing and usage of the contacts, i.e. they were made near the end of the employee’s tenure, which ended on his accord, and they were subsequently used to start up his own competing business.

So, this points to a clear intent to use contacts against the former employer, but I’m sure future cases won’t be as clear cut. I tried to find some cases that handled the use of Rolodexes by former employees, since that would seem to point to a precedent.

There seems to be a big gray area here though. When hiring certain types of positions, e.g. sales, employers frequently judge candidates based heavily on their contacts. And how do you really categorize a business versus a personal contact.

Take a look at your LinkedIn/Facebook/MySpace contacts, your address book or business card Rolodex, and try to segment them into business and personal. There’s bound to be some overlap. Now, try to segment all the business contacts into job buckets. Again, it’s not that easy.

I tend to agree that the legal precedent will evolve around this issue rapidly over the next five years, much as the law has coalesced around how to handle corporate email. It’s only a matter of time before there is a high profile case to set the standard.

So, what do you think? I’m guessing pretty much everyone thinks their address book is personal, which is how I feel. Still I’m interested to get your thoughts and ideas on how this will play out in the future.

Find the comments.

Best Invention of the Last 20 Years?

Meg’s comment on my post about TiVo (note to self, add TiVo to iPhone as a topic that gets lots of comments) got me thinking about the best of the last 20. She said:

I have said often that Tivo is the best invention of the last 20 years, in my life it is equal to the remote control and far surpasses things like wireless networking and digital cameras (which I love).

At its basest form, blogging is about opinion, i.e. your own and maybe some others for “balance”. Meg brings up an interesting point, not only about how much TiVo rocks, but also about comparison.

Is it fair to compare TiVo with wireless networking and digital cameras? So, for giggles, let’s have an good old town hall around this topic.

What is the best invention of the last 20 years? Bonus points for why. If you’re wondering, here are a few arbitrary ground rules.

There aren’t any, aside from the last 20 years bit. I tried to come up with some guidelines, but I’m pretty sure the fun (if any is to be had) of this exercise lies in an open field. I’m interested to hear thoughts.

Here are a few I like, obviously focused on stuff I use every day, not picking a favorite:

  • Digital Video Recorder, i.e. TiVo
  • The cellular telephone
  • The World Wide Web, i.e. consumer version of ARPANET
  • The digital camera
  • Satellite and cable television

This is food for thought. Find the comments and share your thoughts.

How to Do a Set-Top Box

I love my TiVo.

Like pretty much anyone who currently has a DVR, I was interested, but skeptical before I had one. Skeptical not so much about the value-add from a DVR, but because of the rabid fan-ism exhibited by those who owned them.

Now, I’m happily one of those rabid fans. I’ve had TiVo for many years, long enough to have a Series 2 box with lifetime service that I will never surrender. When I bought my second Series 2 box, I was surprised (and saddened) that lifetime service wasn’t an option anymore.

I like TV, and according to research, unhappy people like TV. Oddly, and this is one people who don’t have a DVR don’t get, I watch less TV now than I did before TiVo. So, maybe a DVR is for happy people who want to schedule TV around their happy lives and spend more time on other things.

Anyway, I look at TiVo as the only way to watch TV. To me, not having a DVR is like getting TV out of the air on an antenna. Why would you do that?

I also happen to be a TiVo diehard. I’ve always liked their interface, and they continue to add incremental features that make the DVR more useful, e.g. they just rolled out a feature to allow online ordering from Domino’s through a broadband-connected Series 2/3/HD TiVo. Read More »

Two More iPhone Apps

Another pair of iPhone apps came to my attention today, making it four for the week, and it just so happens one is brought to you by Oracle.

Oracle Business Approvals for Managers
Steven Chan put me on to this one, which looks like an iPhone app that surfaces a lot of the worklist notifications EBS users (managers, in this case) typically see in email and in self-service.

Since I’m no longer a manager (by choice), I fear this app would be useless to me, but someone like Paul would find it totally useful, e.g. to approve my expense reports faster. From the release:

Oracle Business Approvals for Managers is a task-focused mobile solution that enables managers and executives to view and transact pending actions related to expenses, purchase requisitions, as well as HR vacancies and job offers, conveniently and securely on the iPhone.

And in case you were wondering, it’s free (as in beer) to users. Read More »

Panels Experiment

I’m going to try an experiment on all of you.

Don’t worry, it won’t hurt, much.

I’ve just installed Panels, which is a newly launched beta service, on this blog. Panels adds, well, panels to your blog links. From their blog:

With the addition of panels to your site/blog your readers are given all the information about a business or organization that they need before clicking on a link.  Inspired by nutritional panels, our panels are not something that will be looked at every time, but people will be thankful when they look.

Full disclosure: Panels is a Portland startup, and Kevin Fox, a friend of mine, works there. I agreed to give it whirl on this blog. So now, those little panels are out there for you to use or not. The goal here is to let me (and the Panels guys) know what you think. As a startup, they need this type of early feedback.

So, sound off in the comments, or wait a bit, test it out and then sound off in the comments. FYI, the addition of Panels to this blog doesn’t constitute any endorsement of them or their company. All the standard my opinion != my employer’s stuff applies here. I’m just testing out their service. Read More »

Hear Me Now, Read it Later

I saw this post on RWW about Read It Later several weeks ago. I guess Read It Later has been around for a while; it’s a nifty little Firefox add-on that allows you to mark links to read later. Simple enough. Plus it syncs between multiple browser instances, allowing you to have a consolidated reading list.

Sounds similar to Delicious, but targeted at managing stuff to read, rather than storing scads of bookmarks with a network wrapped around them.

What caught my eye was that the new RIL version integrated with Google Reader, my feed reader of choice. So, with the new RIL add-on, I can see the little checkmark to add any feed item to the RIL list. Very useful for me.

I frequently open feed items from Reader into new tabs and leave them open to read later. Sometimes they’ll stay open for days; sometimes Firefox eats up too much memory, forcing a restart. Sometimes I remember to note all the open links, sometimes I don’t.

So, this little add-on sounded like a good way to keep track of my reading list. I promptly installed the Firefox add-on and decided to wait and see how it worked for me before blogging it.

This falls into the “blog it later” bucket. Read More »

Two New (to Me) iPhone Apps

This blog continues to draw iPhone traffic, so here comes an iPhone post to keep you interested.

I installed two new iPhone apps today.

I Can Has Cheezburger
As I probably mentioned in the past, I tend to install apps, test them for a while, then remove them. Very few stick with me for very long.

Today, I found at least one that will, the official I Can Has Cheezburger iPhone app. If you’ve read here long, you’ve probably caught an LOLcat reference or several. Dan mentioned my predilection for cute cats + captions; they make me lulz. I remain unapologetic.

Beyond LOLcats, the ICHC guys have expanded to several other “properties”, including the FAIL Blog (a favorite of Paul’s, just check his Google Reader Shared Items feed). Each blog follows the same winning (or failing, depending on your perspective) formula: collect user-submitted pictures and captions, sell ads, print money. Read More »

Mix: Year One

Mix is one year old today.

Seems like it’s been around forever, at least to me, but you’ll recall we launched it to very little fanfare at the beginning of OpenWorld 2007.

Mix didn’t really get much promotion at all until Marketing decided to solicit session ideas from the community for OpenWorld 2008 back in May. Over the Summer, Marketing extended Mix quite a bit, and it quickly outgrew our bandwidth for support and operations.

Heading into OpenWorld 2008, Mix made its primetime debut as the front end for the Oracle Participate campaign, and looking ahead, Marketing has big plans for Mix. Stay tuned.

Here are some statistics on Mix through (roughly) its first year:

  • 142,220 pageviews a month
  • 15,525 visits a month
  • 4.92 average connections per user
  • 0.45 average sharing activity per user per month

FYI, these stats are also in Paul’s Defrag 08 presentation.

This success belongs to the Oracle community. Without a dedicated collection of Oracle enthusiasts, Mix would have gone nowhere. So, thanks to all of you. Keep on mixing it up and look forward to more cool features from Mix, delivered by Marketing and ENTP.

Get Satisfaction’s Ads

I found this nugget in Paul’s Google Reader Shared Items feed: “Get Satisfaction Launches Socialized Ad Policy“.

As previously documented here, we like what Get Satisfaction does, and even though ads usually put me right into a coma, my curiosity about how ads could be “smart” (from Paul’s note in Reader) overcame me.

Turns out it is a pretty interesting way to do ads. From the announcement:

Here’s the way our new ads work: If you’re logged in to Get Satisfaction, you won’t see them. If you’re curious, they are text ads, of the familiar Google-based type. Contextual. Low-key. Simple.

Who will see them? People who come to us from a Google search. People who don’t have a Get Satisfaction account. People who are, as they say, “just browsing”.

This sounds like a good idea. I’m accustomed to ignoring ads, but I know people pay attention to them because: a) loads of people say they’re annoying and b) they don’t go away, which means someone is clicking on them.

Google famously uses its algorithm to show ads that are related to your keyword searches (in search) or mail (in GMail). For the most part, it seems pretty successful, but in some cases, it fails. Miserably. I know that one’s not Google, but you get the picture. I know a woman who quit using GMail because Google served her ads about hunting. True story.

So, what do you think about Get Satisfaction’s ad strategy? I wonder if they plan to entice people to register to make the ads disappear.

FriendFeed Brings the Firehose to IM

Last week, FriendFeed added an IM feature, allowing you bring the information firehose into your favorite IM client.

I’m a fan of FriendFeed, but it’s very hard to control the noise level. Typically, each person you subscribe to has several streams of information, e.g. a blog, Twitter, Google Reader, etc., making the amount of noise significantly higher.

I have nine services in my feed, but I’ve seen people with way more than that. An unscientific guess tells me the average number of services per person is probably between four and eight. Depending on who you subscribe to and frequency, your FriendFeed can be very noisy.

This is one reason I’ve never liked the Adobe Air clients for FriendFeed, like AlertThingy or Twhirl, too damned noisy. I simply don’t have the brainpower to follow all those items. Read More »

Defrag Debrief: Tuesday

I had planned to do the Defrag recap in a single post, but it got really long. I guess my memory isn’t totally shot yet. So, this is part two of my Defrag recap. Part one is here, if you’re a glutton.

Tuesday
Tuesday was shorter for both Paul and me, as we had planes to catch.

After coffee with Jay Simons and another Atlassian, (what do you call someone who works for Atlassian?), I ran into Daniel Ha founder of Disqus. Ambush might be a bit more accurate. Suffice to say, I like Disqus, and Daniel has been helpful with the few issues we’ve encountered. He did seem a bit taken aback, but I have that effect on people.

Between sessions, Paul and I got a demo of Gist from T.A. McCann, who apparently taught Larry to sail. No joke, that’s what he said.

Anyway, Gist does some very cool things mining data from your inbox and combining it with data from the ‘tubes, similar to what Xoopit does. I’ve abandoned my stance that the inbox is dead; now, I want to make it better and more useful, collecting and analyzing the unused data that live in there. We convinced T.A. to give us beta access, so as I play with Gist, I’ll keep you informed.

Unfortunately, we were so rapt in the demo that we missed a call with Floyd. Sorry dude. You’re smart; I’m dumb. You’re pretty; I’m ugly. You’re successful. I’m a putz. I’ll make it up to you. Read More »

Defrag Debrief: Monday

Looks like I got out of Denver right before a cold front came through, dropping the temperature significantly. Not that the weather is all that great here in Portland.

So, Paul and I were at Defrag Monday and Tuesday, as was Bob, who has done a good job of recapping in near real time.

Overall, I enjoyed the conference, and as is frequently the case for me, the ad hoc hallway conversations were more valuable than the sessions. That’s not to say the session and panel content wasn’t good or interesting; it was both.

Anyway, here goes my recap of noteworthy observations that I can remember from Monday. Read on if you’re interested, and yes, I have enough to separate Tuesday into another post. Just wait and see.

Monday
The conference’s first keynote was from William Duggan, whose book “Strategic Intuition: The Creative Spark in Human Achievement” was in the conference swag bag. I liked his premise, i.e. that great ideas come from the combination of disparate sources and that great innovators steal. This was a great way to kick off a conference whose tagline is “accelerating the aha moment”. Read More »

Defrag08 Presentation

I presented the above at Defrag 08′ in Denver yesterday.  The idea was to take some
known concepts around understanding networks and apply them to how we manage a
community.  This is new ground for us at the lab, but based on the reaction from the
crowd, the direction seems right.  We are working on doing some deeper analysis on
both Mix and Connect in the coming months and will certainly post that content to the
blog as we draw our conclusions.  Thanks to everyone who shared their thoughts and ideas with me after the presentation.  Keep em coming.

I’d also like to thank Valdis Krebs at Orgnet.com for helping me to solidify some of my
early thoughts and for running the initial data on our social networks.  I encourage
anyone interested in this area to check out his writings and his software.

-Paul